Compute Institute — Ratings for AI infrastructure
Compute Institute publishes evidence-backed ratings for AI infrastructure: 30 jurisdictions ranked on the 0–100 Jurisdiction Competitiveness Index (JCI), 35 data-center projects scored for execution risk, and 39,862 MW of tracked capacity across 10,222 monitored source documents — every claim graded on the E1–E5 evidence ladder, 764 of them resting on primary (E1–E2) sources. Qatar leads the Jurisdiction Index at 77.4.
Index as of · How these scores are built
The Jurisdiction Index
Full index with evidence coverage →|
Rank
|
Jurisdiction
|
JCI score
|
Δ vs prior run
|
Tier
|
Outlook
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Qatar | 77.4 /100 | first rating | ||
| #2 | US — Texas (ERCOT) | 72.3 /100 | first rating | ||
| #3 | United Arab Emirates | 69.7 /100 | first rating | ||
| #4 | US — Arizona (APS/SRP) | 67.2 /100 | first rating | ||
| #5 | US — Georgia (Southern/Georgia Power) | 67.2 /100 | first rating | ||
| #6 | Saudi Arabia | 65.2 /100 | first rating | ||
| #7 | US — North Carolina (Duke Energy) | 63.4 /100 | first rating | ||
| #8 | US — Rest of US (composite) | 63.4 /100 | first rating | ||
| #9 | Sweden | 63.1 /100 | first rating | ||
| #10 | Canada | 62.3 /100 | first rating | ||
| #11 | France | 62.3 /100 | first rating | ||
| #12 | Australia | 61.9 /100 | first rating | ||
| #13 | US — Virginia (PJM/Dominion) | 61.6 /100 | first rating | ||
| #14 | US — Ohio (AEP Ohio / PJM) | 61.2 /100 | first rating | ||
| #15 | Denmark | 60.2 /100 | first rating | ||
| #16 | US — Minnesota (Xcel / MISO) | 59.3 /100 | first rating | ||
| #17 | Singapore | 59 /100 | first rating | ||
| #18 | Malaysia — Johor (Johor-Singapore SEZ) | 58.9 /100 | first rating | ||
| #19 | Japan | 58.6 /100 | first rating | ||
| #20 | United Kingdom | 57 /100 | first rating | ||
| #21 | Germany | 56.7 /100 | first rating | ||
| #22 | India | 54.9 /100 | first rating | ||
| #23 | Ireland | 54.1 /100 | first rating | ||
| #24 | Indonesia | 53.6 /100 | first rating | ||
| #25 | South Africa | 52.3 /100 | first rating | ||
| #26 | Brazil | 50.9 /100 | first rating | ||
| #27 | Argentina | 50.7 /100 | first rating | ||
| #28 | Poland | 50.7 /100 | first rating | ||
| #29 | Netherlands | 50.3 /100 | first rating | ||
| #30 | South Korea | 49 /100 | first rating |
Project risk movers
All projects →Project Risk Score (PRS) change between each project's two latest scoring runs, 0–100 (higher is healthier).
Improving
- Stargate Wisconsin - Vantage Lighthouse (Port Washington) 82 +23.0
- Meta Hyperion (Richland Parish) 80.3 +21.3
- Fermi America Project Matador HyperGrid 80 +20.4
- Microsoft Fairwater (Mount Pleasant) 81.3 +19.8
Deteriorating
- Meta Prometheus (New Albany) 53.8 −14.0
Tracked capacity
Megawatts of tracked data-center capacity, from stored project records. 12 projects without a disclosed MW figure are excluded from the MW sums.
By status
- Announced (3 projects)
- 6,500 MW
- Planned (2 projects)
- 201 MW
- Construction (14 projects)
- 27,252 MW
- Operating (3 projects)
- 3,209 MW
- Stalled (1 project)
- 2,700 MW
By jurisdiction
- US — Rest of US (composite) (9)
- 15,422 MW
- US — Texas (ERCOT) (5)
- 14,900 MW
- France (1)
- 5,000 MW
- US — Minnesota (Xcel / MISO) (1)
- 2,700 MW
- United Arab Emirates (4)
- 1,330 MW
- Argentina (3)
- 510 MW