Compute Institute
Ratings for the physical buildout of AI

Jurisdiction Index / US — Georgia (Southern/Georgia Power)

US — Georgia (Southern/Georgia Power)

Tier 2 · Competitive
Stable
Rank #5 of 30
Data confidence A
67.2 /100

JCI composite · as of · methodology v0

US — Georgia (Southern/Georgia Power) scores 67.2/100 on the Compute Institute Jurisdiction Competitiveness Index (Tier 2, Competitive), ranking #5 of 30 rated jurisdictions with a stable outlook, as of June 15, 2026 under methodology v0. Its strongest dimension is Stability & Execution Risk at 8.3/10; its weakest is Power Availability & Deliverability at 6/10. 22 of 22 sub-factors are scored on E1–E2 evidence (data confidence A).

Dimension breakdown

Seven dimensions, each 0–10, weighted per methodology v0. JCI = Σ(dimension × weight) × 10.

Power Availability & Deliverability

6 /10 weight 20%

Power Cost

6.3 /10 weight 12.5%

Speed to Build

7 /10 weight 17.5%

Regulatory & AI Policy Environment

6.3 /10 weight 12.5%

Fiscal & Incentives

6.8 /10 weight 10%

Capital & Ecosystem Depth

6.3 /10 weight 12.5%

Stability & Execution Risk

8.3 /10 weight 15%

Sub-factor scores and sources

Every base-scored input below carries E1–E2 evidence: a justification, an evidence-level grade, and a link to the underlying source document.

Power Availability & Deliverability — 6/10 (weight 20%)

Sub-factor
Score
Justification
Evidence
Source
Grid headroom 40% of dimension 6 /10 GA PSC certified ~10 GW of new generation in Dec 2025 (~80% for data centers) within a ~14 GW-by-2030 expansion plan; vertically integrated planning gives more credible headroom than queue-based markets. as of
E1
Georgia PSC Data Center Fact Sheet (Mar 2026) psc.ga.gov
Time-to-power 35% of dimension 5.5 /10 Georgia Power large-load process typically delivers firm offers in ~3-4 years for >100 MW loads; pipeline rationalization (6 GW shed) signals discipline rather than shorter waits. as of
E2
Georgia Power large-load pipeline (reported, Utility Dive) www.utilitydive.com
Energy mix & expandability 15% of dimension 7 /10 Vogtle 3/4 nuclear online, approved gas/battery expansion, and a PSC-approved bring-your-own clean-resources framework for large loads. as of
E1
GA PSC approval of Georgia Power BYO clean resources plan (reported, Utility Dive) www.utilitydive.com
Water availability 10% of dimension 6.5 /10 Generally low-to-medium stress per WRI, but metro Atlanta withdrawals are constrained by the ACF basin compact history. as of
E1
WRI Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas www.wri.org

Power Cost — 6.3/10 (weight 12.5%)

Sub-factor
Score
Justification
Evidence
Source
Industrial electricity price 60% of dimension 6.5 /10 EIA Georgia industrial average ~7-7.5 c/kWh ($70-75/MWh), near US median for large industrial load. as of
E1
EIA Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.6.A www.eia.gov
Price trajectory & exposure 25% of dimension 5.5 /10 Jan 2025 PSC rule makes >100 MW customers pay upstream grid costs, insulating them from political backlash but raising all-in cost; $52B expansion creates rate-base escalation. as of
E1
Georgia PSC Data Center Fact Sheet (Mar 2026) psc.ga.gov
Cost certainty / contractability 15% of dimension 7 /10 Regulated framework with mandatory long-term (15-yr) contracts for very large loads provides certainty; limited third-party PPA optionality inside Georgia Power territory. as of
E1
Georgia Power large-load tariff filings (GA PSC) psc.ga.gov

Speed to Build — 7/10 (weight 17.5%)

Sub-factor
Score
Justification
Evidence
Source
Permitting regime 40% of dimension 7 /10 Business-friendly state and county permitting with no state environmental review for private builds; a few metro-Atlanta zoning restrictions emerging. as of
E1
Georgia PSC Data Center Fact Sheet (Mar 2026) psc.ga.gov
Observed construction velocity 35% of dimension 7 /10 QTS Atlanta, Meta Newton County and similar campuses delivered on ~2-yr shells; internal project DB not yet populated. as of
E2
Sponsor disclosures (QTS/Meta Georgia campuses) www.qtsdatacenters.com
Labor & supply capacity 25% of dimension 7 /10 Strong Southeast construction labor market and EPC depth around Atlanta; competition from other regional megaprojects. as of
E2
US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics www.bls.gov

Regulatory & AI Policy Environment — 6.3/10 (weight 12.5%)

Sub-factor
Score
Justification
Evidence
Source
AI-specific law in force 35% of dimension 5.5 /10 No comprehensive Georgia AI statute in force; federal baseline only — permissive but uncertain per D4 note. as of
E1
Georgia General Assembly legislative record www.legis.ga.gov
DC-specific regulation 35% of dimension 6 /10 PSC large-load rules in force; 2026 session bills to curb tax breaks and rate impacts failed, leaving regime unchanged; isolated local restrictions (Atlanta BeltLine ordinance). as of
E1
Georgia 2026 legislative session outcome (reported, 13WMAZ) www.13wmaz.com
Regulatory predictability 30% of dimension 7.5 /10 US WGI Regulatory Quality/Rule of Law high-80s percentile; stable PSC process. as of
E1
World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators www.worldbank.org

Fiscal & Incentives — 6.8/10 (weight 10%)

Sub-factor
Score
Justification
Evidence
Source
Enacted incentives 40% of dimension 8 /10 State+local sales/use tax exemption for qualifying data center equipment in force (O.C.G.A. §48-8-3(68.1)), thresholds from $25M-$250M by county size. as of
E1
O.C.G.A. §48-8-3 (data center equipment exemption) law.justia.com
Headline tax burden 40% of dimension 6.5 /10 Georgia CIT 5.39% (on a legislated path down) plus 21% federal. as of
E1
Georgia Department of Revenue — corporate income tax dor.georgia.gov
Incentive durability 20% of dimension 5 /10 2024 suspension bill vetoed and 2026 repeal attempts failed, but $474M FY25 forgone-revenue audit keeps the exemption politically contested. as of
E1
Georgia 2026 legislative session outcome (reported, 13WMAZ) www.13wmaz.com

Capital & Ecosystem Depth — 6.3/10 (weight 12.5%)

Sub-factor
Score
Justification
Evidence
Source
Committed capital 40% of dimension 7.5 /10 Multi-GW of certified, contracted large-load projects behind the PSC's 10 GW generation approval (Meta, Microsoft, QTS, Anthropic-linked campuses). as of
E1
Georgia PSC Data Center Fact Sheet (Mar 2026) psc.ga.gov
Ecosystem 30% of dimension 8 /10 Atlanta is a top-5 US DC market with major carrier hotel density (56 Marietta), transatlantic fiber via coastal landings, full hyperscaler presence, unrestricted GPUs. as of
E1
EIA/ERCOT load data; TeleGeography fiber maps www.submarinecablemap.com
Sovereign/anchor capital availability 30% of dimension 3 /10 No sovereign or state co-investment vehicle targeting AI infrastructure. as of
E1
IFSWF member directory (no US state AI-infra SWF) www.ifswf.org

Stability & Execution Risk — 8.3/10 (weight 15%)

Sub-factor
Score
Justification
Evidence
Source
Political/policy continuity 40% of dimension 7.5 /10 Consistent bipartisan pro-investment posture; veto of incentive rollback demonstrated executive continuity. as of
E1
World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators www.worldbank.org
Currency, transfer & convertibility 35% of dimension 9.5 /10 USD, no capital controls, AA+ sovereign. as of
E1
IMF AREAER — United States www.elibrary-areaer.imf.org
Physical & geopolitical risk 25% of dimension 8 /10 No sanctions/conflict exposure; moderate hurricane-remnant and severe-weather exposure inland. as of
E1
FEMA National Risk Index hazards.fema.gov

Signals

Recent ingested source documents linked to this jurisdiction via extracted claims or triage mentions, newest first.

  1. · The Guardian · relevance 0.70

  2. · Latitude Media · relevance 0.30

  3. · Georgia Recorder · relevance 0.20

  4. · Georgia Recorder · relevance 0.00

  5. · Georgia Recorder · relevance 0.20

  6. · Georgia Recorder · relevance 0.00

  7. · Georgia Recorder · relevance 0.00

  8. · Tom’s Hardware · relevance 0.70

  9. · Georgia Recorder · relevance 0.00

  10. · Georgia Recorder · relevance 0.00

Scores are reproducible from the frozen inputs snapshot recorded at computation time (2026-06-15T23:52:43+00:00). See the full methodology for rubrics, weights, and the evidence ladder.