Jurisdiction Index / US — Georgia (Southern/Georgia Power)
US — Georgia (Southern/Georgia Power)
JCI composite · as of · methodology v0
US — Georgia (Southern/Georgia Power) scores 67.2/100 on the Compute Institute Jurisdiction Competitiveness Index (Tier 2, Competitive), ranking #5 of 30 rated jurisdictions with a stable outlook, as of June 15, 2026 under methodology v0. Its strongest dimension is Stability & Execution Risk at 8.3/10; its weakest is Power Availability & Deliverability at 6/10. 22 of 22 sub-factors are scored on E1–E2 evidence (data confidence A).
Dimension breakdown
Seven dimensions, each 0–10, weighted per methodology v0. JCI = Σ(dimension × weight) × 10.
Power Availability & Deliverability
Power Cost
Speed to Build
Regulatory & AI Policy Environment
Fiscal & Incentives
Capital & Ecosystem Depth
Stability & Execution Risk
Sub-factor scores and sources
Every base-scored input below carries E1–E2 evidence: a justification, an evidence-level grade, and a link to the underlying source document.
Power Availability & Deliverability — 6/10 (weight 20%)
|
Sub-factor
|
Score
|
Justification
|
Evidence
|
Source
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grid headroom 40% of dimension | 6 /10 | GA PSC certified ~10 GW of new generation in Dec 2025 (~80% for data centers) within a ~14 GW-by-2030 expansion plan; vertically integrated planning gives more credible headroom than queue-based markets. as of | Georgia PSC Data Center Fact Sheet (Mar 2026) psc.ga.gov | |
| Time-to-power 35% of dimension | 5.5 /10 | Georgia Power large-load process typically delivers firm offers in ~3-4 years for >100 MW loads; pipeline rationalization (6 GW shed) signals discipline rather than shorter waits. as of | Georgia Power large-load pipeline (reported, Utility Dive) www.utilitydive.com | |
| Energy mix & expandability 15% of dimension | 7 /10 | Vogtle 3/4 nuclear online, approved gas/battery expansion, and a PSC-approved bring-your-own clean-resources framework for large loads. as of | GA PSC approval of Georgia Power BYO clean resources plan (reported, Utility Dive) www.utilitydive.com | |
| Water availability 10% of dimension | 6.5 /10 | Generally low-to-medium stress per WRI, but metro Atlanta withdrawals are constrained by the ACF basin compact history. as of | WRI Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas www.wri.org |
Power Cost — 6.3/10 (weight 12.5%)
|
Sub-factor
|
Score
|
Justification
|
Evidence
|
Source
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industrial electricity price 60% of dimension | 6.5 /10 | EIA Georgia industrial average ~7-7.5 c/kWh ($70-75/MWh), near US median for large industrial load. as of | EIA Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.6.A www.eia.gov | |
| Price trajectory & exposure 25% of dimension | 5.5 /10 | Jan 2025 PSC rule makes >100 MW customers pay upstream grid costs, insulating them from political backlash but raising all-in cost; $52B expansion creates rate-base escalation. as of | Georgia PSC Data Center Fact Sheet (Mar 2026) psc.ga.gov | |
| Cost certainty / contractability 15% of dimension | 7 /10 | Regulated framework with mandatory long-term (15-yr) contracts for very large loads provides certainty; limited third-party PPA optionality inside Georgia Power territory. as of | Georgia Power large-load tariff filings (GA PSC) psc.ga.gov |
Speed to Build — 7/10 (weight 17.5%)
|
Sub-factor
|
Score
|
Justification
|
Evidence
|
Source
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Permitting regime 40% of dimension | 7 /10 | Business-friendly state and county permitting with no state environmental review for private builds; a few metro-Atlanta zoning restrictions emerging. as of | Georgia PSC Data Center Fact Sheet (Mar 2026) psc.ga.gov | |
| Observed construction velocity 35% of dimension | 7 /10 | QTS Atlanta, Meta Newton County and similar campuses delivered on ~2-yr shells; internal project DB not yet populated. as of | Sponsor disclosures (QTS/Meta Georgia campuses) www.qtsdatacenters.com | |
| Labor & supply capacity 25% of dimension | 7 /10 | Strong Southeast construction labor market and EPC depth around Atlanta; competition from other regional megaprojects. as of | US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics www.bls.gov |
Regulatory & AI Policy Environment — 6.3/10 (weight 12.5%)
|
Sub-factor
|
Score
|
Justification
|
Evidence
|
Source
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-specific law in force 35% of dimension | 5.5 /10 | No comprehensive Georgia AI statute in force; federal baseline only — permissive but uncertain per D4 note. as of | Georgia General Assembly legislative record www.legis.ga.gov | |
| DC-specific regulation 35% of dimension | 6 /10 | PSC large-load rules in force; 2026 session bills to curb tax breaks and rate impacts failed, leaving regime unchanged; isolated local restrictions (Atlanta BeltLine ordinance). as of | Georgia 2026 legislative session outcome (reported, 13WMAZ) www.13wmaz.com | |
| Regulatory predictability 30% of dimension | 7.5 /10 | US WGI Regulatory Quality/Rule of Law high-80s percentile; stable PSC process. as of | World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators www.worldbank.org |
Fiscal & Incentives — 6.8/10 (weight 10%)
|
Sub-factor
|
Score
|
Justification
|
Evidence
|
Source
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enacted incentives 40% of dimension | 8 /10 | State+local sales/use tax exemption for qualifying data center equipment in force (O.C.G.A. §48-8-3(68.1)), thresholds from $25M-$250M by county size. as of | O.C.G.A. §48-8-3 (data center equipment exemption) law.justia.com | |
| Headline tax burden 40% of dimension | 6.5 /10 | Georgia CIT 5.39% (on a legislated path down) plus 21% federal. as of | Georgia Department of Revenue — corporate income tax dor.georgia.gov | |
| Incentive durability 20% of dimension | 5 /10 | 2024 suspension bill vetoed and 2026 repeal attempts failed, but $474M FY25 forgone-revenue audit keeps the exemption politically contested. as of | Georgia 2026 legislative session outcome (reported, 13WMAZ) www.13wmaz.com |
Capital & Ecosystem Depth — 6.3/10 (weight 12.5%)
|
Sub-factor
|
Score
|
Justification
|
Evidence
|
Source
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Committed capital 40% of dimension | 7.5 /10 | Multi-GW of certified, contracted large-load projects behind the PSC's 10 GW generation approval (Meta, Microsoft, QTS, Anthropic-linked campuses). as of | Georgia PSC Data Center Fact Sheet (Mar 2026) psc.ga.gov | |
| Ecosystem 30% of dimension | 8 /10 | Atlanta is a top-5 US DC market with major carrier hotel density (56 Marietta), transatlantic fiber via coastal landings, full hyperscaler presence, unrestricted GPUs. as of | EIA/ERCOT load data; TeleGeography fiber maps www.submarinecablemap.com | |
| Sovereign/anchor capital availability 30% of dimension | 3 /10 | No sovereign or state co-investment vehicle targeting AI infrastructure. as of | IFSWF member directory (no US state AI-infra SWF) www.ifswf.org |
Stability & Execution Risk — 8.3/10 (weight 15%)
|
Sub-factor
|
Score
|
Justification
|
Evidence
|
Source
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Political/policy continuity 40% of dimension | 7.5 /10 | Consistent bipartisan pro-investment posture; veto of incentive rollback demonstrated executive continuity. as of | World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators www.worldbank.org | |
| Currency, transfer & convertibility 35% of dimension | 9.5 /10 | USD, no capital controls, AA+ sovereign. as of | IMF AREAER — United States www.elibrary-areaer.imf.org | |
| Physical & geopolitical risk 25% of dimension | 8 /10 | No sanctions/conflict exposure; moderate hurricane-remnant and severe-weather exposure inland. as of | FEMA National Risk Index hazards.fema.gov |
Signals
Recent ingested source documents linked to this jurisdiction via extracted claims or triage mentions, newest first.
-
· The Guardian · relevance 0.70
-
· Latitude Media · relevance 0.30
-
· Georgia Recorder · relevance 0.20
-
· Georgia Recorder · relevance 0.00
-
· Georgia Recorder · relevance 0.20
-
· Georgia Recorder · relevance 0.00
-
· Georgia Recorder · relevance 0.00
-
· Tom’s Hardware · relevance 0.70
-
· Georgia Recorder · relevance 0.00
-
· Georgia Recorder · relevance 0.00
Scores are reproducible from the frozen inputs snapshot recorded at computation time (2026-06-15T23:52:43+00:00). See the full methodology for rubrics, weights, and the evidence ladder.