Compute Institute
Ratings for the physical buildout of AI

The Compute Institute Jurisdiction Index

The Compute Institute Jurisdiction Index ranks 39 jurisdictions for AI data-center investment on the 0–100 Compute Institute Jurisdiction Competitiveness Index (JCI) across seven weighted dimensions: power availability & deliverability (20%), speed to build (17.5%), stability & execution risk (15%), power cost (12.5%), regulatory & AI policy (12.5%), capital & ecosystem depth (12.5%), and fiscal incentives (10%). Base scores admit only E1–E2 evidence — government primary records and company disclosures — and every input is traceable to a named, linked source. As of September 14, 2026 under methodology v0, Qatar leads at 77.4 (Tier 1, Advantaged), followed by US — Iowa (MISO) at 76.5 and US — Indiana (MISO) at 72.4. Qatar, US — Indiana (MISO), United Arab Emirates, US — Wisconsin (MISO), US — Tennessee (TVA federal power / MLGW & local distributors; non-RTO), US — Louisiana (Entergy Louisiana / SWEPCO / Cleco — MISO South, LRZ 9; regulator: Louisiana Public Service Commission), US — North Carolina (Duke Energy), Sweden, US — Ohio (AEP Ohio / PJM), US — Pennsylvania (PJM), Malaysia — Johor (Johor-Singapore SEZ), Germany, Ireland, Brazil, Argentina and Poland carry a positive outlook; Australia, Denmark, South Africa, Netherlands, US — Utah (Rocky Mountain Power / PacifiCorp, WECC — non-RTO) and US — Maryland (BGE / Pepco / Delmarva Power / Potomac Edison — PJM) carry a negative outlook; all other outlooks are stable.

As of · Methodology v0 · How these scores are built

Rank
Jurisdiction
JCI score
Tier
Outlook
E1–E2 coverage
Top strength
Top weakness
#1 Qatar 77.4 /100
Tier 1 · Advantaged
Positive
16/22
Stability & Execution Risk (8.5/10)
Speed to Build (0/10)
#2 US — Iowa (MISO) 76.5 /100
Tier 1 · Advantaged
Stable
21/22
Capital & Ecosystem Depth (8.7/10)
Power Availability & Deliverability (6.6/10)
#3 US — Indiana (MISO) 72.4 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Positive
20/22
Capital & Ecosystem Depth (8.7/10)
Power Cost (5.1/10)
#4 US — Texas (ERCOT) 72.3 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Stable
22/22
Stability & Execution Risk (8/10)
Power Availability & Deliverability (6.4/10)
#5 United Arab Emirates 69.7 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Positive
20/22
Capital & Ecosystem Depth (8/10)
Power Cost (6.3/10)
#6 US — Wisconsin (MISO) 68.5 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Positive
21/22
Stability & Execution Risk (8.5/10)
Power Cost (4.9/10)
#7 US — Arizona (APS/SRP) 67.2 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Stable
20/22
Fiscal & Incentives (7.7/10)
Power Availability & Deliverability (5.1/10)
#8 US — Georgia (Southern/Georgia Power) 67.2 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Stable
22/22
Stability & Execution Risk (8.3/10)
Power Availability & Deliverability (6/10)
#9 US — Tennessee (TVA federal power / MLGW & local distributors; non-RTO) 66 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Positive
14/22
Stability & Execution Risk (7.5/10)
Regulatory & AI Policy Environment (5.4/10)
#10 Saudi Arabia 65.2 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Stable
21/22
Capital & Ecosystem Depth (7.4/10)
Regulatory & AI Policy Environment (5.7/10)
#11 US — Louisiana (Entergy Louisiana / SWEPCO / Cleco — MISO South, LRZ 9; regulator: Louisiana Public Service Commission) 63.5 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Positive
18/22
Stability & Execution Risk (7.3/10)
Capital & Ecosystem Depth (2/10)
#12 US — North Carolina (Duke Energy) 63.4 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Positive
14/22
Stability & Execution Risk (7.8/10)
Speed to Build (0/10)
#13 US — Rest of US (composite) 63.4 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Stable
22/22
Stability & Execution Risk (8.1/10)
Power Availability & Deliverability (5.1/10)
#14 Sweden 63.1 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Positive
18/22
Stability & Execution Risk (8.8/10)
Speed to Build (4/10)
#15 Canada 62.3 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Stable
21/22
Stability & Execution Risk (8.5/10)
Power Availability & Deliverability (5.2/10)
#16 France 62.3 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Stable
22/22
Stability & Execution Risk (7.6/10)
Fiscal & Incentives (5.5/10)
#17 Australia 61.9 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Negative
20/22
Stability & Execution Risk (8.6/10)
Fiscal & Incentives (4.7/10)
#18 US — Virginia (PJM/Dominion) 61.6 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Stable
22/22
Stability & Execution Risk (8.3/10)
Power Availability & Deliverability (3.9/10)
#19 US — Ohio (AEP Ohio / PJM) 61.2 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Positive
16/22
Capital & Ecosystem Depth (8/10)
Power Availability & Deliverability (4.3/10)
#20 US — Pennsylvania (PJM) 60.4 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Positive
17/22
Stability & Execution Risk (8.4/10)
Speed to Build (0/10)
#21 Denmark 60.2 /100
Tier 2 · Competitive
Negative
18/22
Stability & Execution Risk (8.9/10)
Power Availability & Deliverability (4.2/10)
#22 US — Minnesota (Xcel / MISO) 59.3 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Stable
18/22
Stability & Execution Risk (8.4/10)
Capital & Ecosystem Depth (3.3/10)
#23 Singapore 59 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Stable
22/22
Stability & Execution Risk (9/10)
Power Availability & Deliverability (2.8/10)
#24 Malaysia — Johor (Johor-Singapore SEZ) 58.9 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Positive
13/22
Power Availability & Deliverability (6.8/10)
Speed to Build (0/10)
#25 Japan 58.6 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Stable
19/22
Regulatory & AI Policy Environment (8/10)
Power Cost (1.6/10)
#26 United Kingdom 57 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Stable
22/22
Stability & Execution Risk (8.2/10)
Power Cost (3.3/10)
#27 Germany 56.7 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Positive
19/22
Stability & Execution Risk (8.3/10)
Power Cost (3.2/10)
#28 US — Nebraska (OPPD / NPPD / LES, 100% consumer-owned public power; SPP) 55.7 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Stable
21/22
Stability & Execution Risk (7/10)
Fiscal & Incentives (4.1/10)
#29 India 54.9 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Stable
22/22
Capital & Ecosystem Depth (6.1/10)
Power Availability & Deliverability (4.9/10)
#30 Ireland 54.1 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Positive
16/22
Stability & Execution Risk (8.5/10)
Speed to Build (0/10)
#31 Indonesia 53.6 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Stable
15/22
Capital & Ecosystem Depth (7/10)
Power Availability & Deliverability (3.9/10)
#32 South Africa 52.3 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Negative
17/22
Speed to Build (6.5/10)
Power Availability & Deliverability (3.9/10)
#33 Brazil 50.9 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Positive
17/22
Capital & Ecosystem Depth (6.4/10)
Power Cost (2.7/10)
#34 Argentina 50.7 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Positive
21/22
Fiscal & Incentives (7/10)
Stability & Execution Risk (3/10)
#35 Poland 50.7 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Positive
17/22
Stability & Execution Risk (6.6/10)
Capital & Ecosystem Depth (0/10)
#36 Netherlands 50.3 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Negative
19/22
Capital & Ecosystem Depth (8.5/10)
Power Availability & Deliverability (2.8/10)
#37 South Korea 49 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Stable
20/22
Capital & Ecosystem Depth (7.9/10)
Power Cost (2.2/10)
#38 US — Utah (Rocky Mountain Power / PacifiCorp, WECC — non-RTO) 46.9 /100
Tier 3 · Contested
Negative
19/22
Stability & Execution Risk (7.2/10)
Capital & Ecosystem Depth (2.5/10)
#39 US — Maryland (BGE / Pepco / Delmarva Power / Potomac Edison — PJM) 35.3 /100
Tier 4 · Constrained
Negative
20/22
Stability & Execution Risk (7/10)
Power Cost (1.8/10)

Tiers: 1 Advantaged (≥75) · 2 Competitive (≥60) · 3 Contested (≥45) · 4 Constrained (≥30) · 5 Impaired (<30). E1–E2 coverage counts sub-factors scored on government primary records (E1) or company primary disclosures (E2); weaker evidence (E3–E5) never enters a base score — it can only move the outlook. Open any jurisdiction for the full sub-factor table with justifications, evidence levels, and linked sources.