Compute Institute
Ratings for the physical buildout of AI

Jurisdiction Index / France

France

Tier 2 · Competitive
Stable
Rank #11 of 30
Data confidence A
62.3 /100

JCI composite · as of · methodology v0

France scores 62.3/100 on the Compute Institute Jurisdiction Competitiveness Index (Tier 2, Competitive), ranking #11 of 30 rated jurisdictions with a stable outlook, as of June 15, 2026 under methodology v0. Its strongest dimension is Stability & Execution Risk at 7.6/10; its weakest is Fiscal & Incentives at 5.5/10. 22 of 22 sub-factors are scored on E1–E2 evidence (data confidence A).

Dimension breakdown

Seven dimensions, each 0–10, weighted per methodology v0. JCI = Σ(dimension × weight) × 10.

Power Availability & Deliverability

6.5 /10 weight 20%

Power Cost

5.9 /10 weight 12.5%

Speed to Build

5.6 /10 weight 17.5%

Regulatory & AI Policy Environment

5.9 /10 weight 12.5%

Fiscal & Incentives

5.5 /10 weight 10%

Capital & Ecosystem Depth

6.3 /10 weight 12.5%

Stability & Execution Risk

7.6 /10 weight 15%

Sub-factor scores and sources

Every base-scored input below carries E1–E2 evidence: a justification, an evidence-level grade, and a link to the underlying source document.

Power Availability & Deliverability — 6.5/10 (weight 20%)

Sub-factor
Score
Justification
Evidence
Source
Grid headroom 40% of dimension 7 /10 ~61 GW nuclear fleet, structural net exporter; RTE has committed capacity for large projects and EDF tendered four sites with 3 GW of available power. as of
E1
RTE generation and adequacy data analysesetdonnees.rte-france.com
Time-to-power 35% of dimension 6 /10 Pre-equipped EDF/RTE sites offer grid access in ~2-3 yrs; standard large-load connections typically 3-4 yrs with queue reform underway. as of
E2
EDF data-center site tender disclosures (DCD analysis) www.datacenterdynamics.com
Energy mix & expandability 15% of dimension 6 /10 Existing nuclear gives firm low-carbon supply, but new firm capacity (EPR2 program) is 2035+; near-term expandability rests on uprates and demand-side room. as of
E1
RTE Bilan prévisionnel www.rte-france.com
Water availability 10% of dimension 6.5 /10 Low-to-medium stress in northern siting regions; drought-year river-temperature constraints already bind nuclear cooling in summer. as of
E1
WRI Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas www.wri.org

Power Cost — 5.9/10 (weight 12.5%)

Sub-factor
Score
Justification
Evidence
Source
Industrial electricity price 60% of dimension 5.5 /10 Large-industrial all-in prices ~EUR 80-100/MWh post-ARENH; nuclear-linked long-term contracts (CAPN) land below EU average but above US Gulf/Texas. as of
E1
Eurostat electricity price statistics (non-household) ec.europa.eu
Price trajectory & exposure 25% of dimension 6 /10 Post-2025 EDF nuclear pricing framework (~EUR 70/MWh reference with profit-sharing) is set; network tariff escalation moderate. as of
E1
CRE — French energy regulator tariff decisions www.cre.fr
Cost certainty / contractability 15% of dimension 7.5 /10 EDF long-term nuclear allocation contracts and a deep EUR PPA market support 10-15 yr fixed structures. as of
E1
EDF long-term nuclear supply contracts (CAPN) www.edf.fr

Speed to Build — 5.6/10 (weight 17.5%)

Sub-factor
Score
Justification
Evidence
Source
Permitting regime 40% of dimension 5.5 /10 2025 economic-simplification law lets large data centers be designated 'projects of major national interest' with accelerated permitting; baseline environmental review remains slower than US Sun Belt. as of
E2
Loi de simplification de la vie économique — PINM designation for data centres (Légifrance) www.legifrance.gouv.fr
Observed construction velocity 35% of dimension 5.5 /10 Paris-region builds (Data4, Digital Realty) deliver in ~2.5-3 yrs; no completed >=100 MW AI campus yet — moderate confidence. as of
E2
EDF data-center site tender disclosures (DCD analysis) www.datacenterdynamics.com
Labor & supply capacity 25% of dimension 6 /10 Strong nuclear-grade EPC base (Vinci, Bouygues, Eiffage) and EU equipment supply chains; high labor cost and 35-hr constraints slow peak staffing. as of
E2
INSEE construction statistics www.insee.fr

Regulatory & AI Policy Environment — 5.9/10 (weight 12.5%)

Sub-factor
Score
Justification
Evidence
Source
AI-specific law in force 35% of dimension 4.5 /10 EU AI Act in force (GPAI obligations applying since Aug 2025); May 2026 Digital Omnibus defers high-risk duties to Dec 2027/Aug 2028 — enacted and certain, but the most compliance-heavy regime in cohort. as of
E1
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act); Council/EP omnibus agreement 7 May 2026 eur-lex.europa.eu
DC-specific regulation 35% of dimension 6 /10 No moratoria; EU Energy Efficiency Directive reporting and waste-heat assessments apply; national policy actively recruits DCs. as of
E1
EU Energy Efficiency Directive (2023/1791) data-centre provisions eur-lex.europa.eu
Regulatory predictability 30% of dimension 7.5 /10 WGI Regulatory Quality/Rule of Law mid-80s percentile; EU-level rule changes (omnibus) cut both ways on stability. as of
E1
World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators www.worldbank.org

Fiscal & Incentives — 5.5/10 (weight 10%)

Sub-factor
Score
Justification
Evidence
Source
Enacted incentives 40% of dimension 5.5 /10 Electro-intensive user levy relief (TICFE/accise reductions) and France 2030 funding in force; no DC-specific tax abatement. as of
E1
French finance code — electricity excise relief for electro-intensives www.impots.gouv.fr
Headline tax burden 40% of dimension 5 /10 25% CIT plus production taxes and high employer charges; Pillar Two applies. as of
E1
OECD Corporate Tax Statistics — United States www.oecd.org
Incentive durability 20% of dimension 6.5 /10 EU state-aid framework constrains both granting and arbitrary withdrawal; budget pressure creates levy-tinkering risk. as of
E1
European Commission state aid register competition-cases.ec.europa.eu

Capital & Ecosystem Depth — 6.3/10 (weight 12.5%)

Sub-factor
Score
Justification
Evidence
Source
Committed capital 40% of dimension 6 /10 Financed projects (Data4/Brookfield expansions, Eclairion/Mistral compute, initial Fluidstack phase) total several GW-scale commitments; the EUR 109B announced figure is mostly E4 and excluded. as of
E2
EDF data-center site tender disclosures (DCD analysis) www.datacenterdynamics.com
Ecosystem 30% of dimension 6.5 /10 Paris is a FLAP-D market, Marseille a global subsea hub; hyperscaler regions present; GPU imports unrestricted for France. as of
E1
EIA/ERCOT load data; TeleGeography fiber maps www.submarinecablemap.com
Sovereign/anchor capital availability 30% of dimension 6.5 /10 Bpifrance/Caisse des Dépôts co-investment vehicles in force and EU InvestAI EUR 20B gigafactory fund appropriated (E2). as of
E2
European Commission — InvestAI initiative digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu

Stability & Execution Risk — 7.6/10 (weight 15%)

Sub-factor
Score
Justification
Evidence
Source
Political/policy continuity 40% of dimension 6 /10 Pro-nuclear, pro-AI stance is cross-party, but 2024-26 governmental instability (successive PM changes, budget standoffs) raises medium-term policy execution risk. as of
E1
World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators www.worldbank.org
Currency, transfer & convertibility 35% of dimension 9 /10 EUR fully convertible, no capital controls, AA- sovereign. as of
E1
IMF AREAER — United States www.elibrary-areaer.imf.org
Physical & geopolitical risk 25% of dimension 8 /10 No conflict exposure; low natural-hazard profile in northern siting regions; EU supply-chain autonomy efforts reduce single-supplier dependency. as of
E1
ACLED / public risk data acleddata.com

Signals

Recent ingested source documents linked to this jurisdiction via extracted claims or triage mentions, newest first.

  1. · Bloomberg Technology · relevance 0.30

  2. · Data Center Knowledge · relevance 0.70

  3. · ET Home · relevance 0.90

  4. · ET News · relevance 0.20

  5. · Quartz · relevance 0.85

  6. · Bloomberg Technology · relevance 0.50

  7. · thenextweb.com · relevance 0.85

  8. · Tom’s Hardware · relevance 0.70

  9. · Reuters · relevance 0.70

  10. · Google News Business · relevance 0.80

Scores are reproducible from the frozen inputs snapshot recorded at computation time (2026-06-15T23:52:37+00:00). See the full methodology for rubrics, weights, and the evidence ladder.