Ratings for the physical buildout of AI
AI Data Center Projects
156 tracked projects representing
115,101 MW of announced or built capacity across
23 jurisdictions.
156 carry a current 0–100 delivery health score (higher is healthier),
scored across schedule, regulatory, infrastructure, and capital risk — every factor cites its source.
Insights
Five builds cluster at 80+ health (xAI Memphis, Stargate Wisconsin, AWS Lake Anna, Meta Hyperion, Fermi Matador), signaling on-track delivery; two projects have collapsed to 10 (Project Aggie, Prince William Gateway), with Prince William's 46-point drop flagging acute regulatory or infrastructure failure. The real risk: 58 projects mid-construction lack granular scoring—execution velocity on that cohort will determine whether the 115 GW pipeline actually materializes.
AI-generated · updated 4 hours ago
Status
All statuses Announced Planned Permitting Permitted Construction Energized Commissioned Operating Stalled Cancelled
Jurisdiction
All jurisdictions Argentina Australia France Germany Japan Malaysia — Johor (Johor-Singapore SEZ) Netherlands Singapore South Korea United Arab Emirates United Kingdom US — Arizona (APS/SRP) US — Georgia (Southern/Georgia Power) US — Indiana (MISO) US — Iowa (MISO) US — Minnesota (Xcel / MISO) US — North Carolina (Duke Energy) US — Ohio (AEP Ohio / PJM) US — Pennsylvania (PJM) US — Rest of US (composite) US — Texas (ERCOT) US — Virginia (PJM/Dominion) US — Wisconsin (MISO)
Health score
All scores 80-100 60-79 40-59 0-39
Clear filters
3 projects